![]() ![]() I think one alternative to having the license utility would be to just make the trial version more limited. Creating a user that has read access to system file isn't trivial either, so I went with the lazy option, to run it as root and trust the dev when they say that license_utility doesn't write anything (because who knows, it might have a mechanism that fucks up your system if it thinks someone is trying to circumvent the copy protection, and like all code those things can fail.) I would've like to install AS on my largest drive, but since it's nosuid mounted the license_utility wouldn't run, and I had to move it to my system SSD. It sucks to have your hard work pirated, but they seem to always be able to remove the protection, and the end result being that the pirated version has a better user experience than the legally bought one. I understand that it's probably necessary to avoid people just deleting a file to reset the 30 day trial, and that it probably helps with copy protection, but it feels like this might hurt paying customers (and prospective customers who want to try the demo) more than it stops piracy. Maybe it's possible to distribute AS using AppImage or Flatpak instead, and get rid of these extra steps? Even if I can delete the Qt tools manually later, the required dependencies are 700MB which seems a bit excessive, given that I already have Qt5 on my system. And contrary to AS install instructions, it's not possible to deselect "Qt tools" so it always installs those. To install Qt you also need to register an account, which isn't too hard, but annoying. Google eventually led me to an archive download page, where I could get the correct installer, which btw is 1.3GB. First of all, finding the exact version wasn't entirely easy, as qt.io seems to try really hard to get visitors to download whatever version/installer they think is best. I have Qt 5.12.8 installed on my system, but I still needed to download a different version just for AS. I appreciate a Linux version of the software, but honestly installation was quite painful. It's also very generous of the developer to have a 30-day trial without limitations to the software I wanted to transcribe a piano song from an anime, and AS got 99% of it correct without any user input. I can't comment for professionals bc maybe they are already doing what anthemscore does.Some feedback after using AS demo for a few hours:įirst of all, it's a very impressive piece of software. The tool is probably most beneficial for beginners and then intermediates for either building composition skills or arranging simple tunes into music sheets for their kids that is otherwise not available for purchase (which was why I started looking into audio to music sheet tools). I plan on 3-years of usage to get the most of of this investment. I dont know if the product will continue support into Windows. The last 2 didn't have the value proposition so I decided with anthemscore. ![]() ![]() I was on the fence with anthemscore but decided to buy it. and we have to further refine it to make it really valuable for playtime. Anthemscore will build the skeletal framework. this is a great tool to assist building that skill. For beginners with no talent with pitches. I converted my desired song for piano and arranged a simple tune for my kids. I am still a rookie at these things but my first conversion was successful and used an input that was NOT with a piano (classic 80s 90s cartoon theme) but output was for piano. ![]() I don't know much of the neural network because I am still freshmen college with a degree of computer programming and also an experienced transcriber. Since the Musescore 3 is on development, I suggest Musescore team should also use neural network(?) to implement the (semi-)realtime MIDI notation. The program also predicts accurate time signature, tempo and key signature which is good for beginner and experienced transcriber especially to those who have no perfect pitch talent. The program works with the implementation of trained "Neural Network" and advanced "Algorithms", of course, the program did its best with the accuracy of 96% if the music file is only consist of piano instrument alone in slower speed. I recently used the demo version of it to transcribe a music file to music notation because I have many favorite piano and semi-orchestra music but no sheet available on the web. Have anyone tried transcribing using the program called "AnthemScore" by Lunaverus? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |